Submarine Classes: Difference between revisions
From PigBoats.COM
Pbcjohnston (talk | contribs) |
Pbcjohnston (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
|[[181|Pompano SS 181]] *|| [[193|Swordfish SS 193]] *|| [[207|Grampus SS 207]] * | |[[181|Pompano SS 181]] *|| [[193|Swordfish SS 193]] *|| [[207|Grampus SS 207]] * | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[ | |[[Salmon/Sargo Class|Salmon/Sargo Class]] || [[194|Seadragon SS 194]]||[[209|Grayling SS 209 *]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[183|Seal SS 183]] || [[195|Sealion SS 195]] *|| [[210| Grenadier SS 210]] * | |[[183|Seal SS 183]] || [[195|Sealion SS 195]] *|| [[210| Grenadier SS 210]] * |
Revision as of 18:58, 13 May 2023
Harbor Defense, Coastal Defense, and Concept Development Submarines
What the U.S. Navy wanted in a submarine changed rapidly and often during the 1900-1933 years. These boats filled several different roles while the Navy refined the strategic and tactical concepts of submarine operations. All of these boats contributed something to this effort, although not all were successful.
Holland | A-class | B-class | C-class | D-class | E-class | F-class | G-class |
H-class | K-class | L-class | M-class | N-class | O-class | R-class | S-class |
T-class | V-class |
Later Fleet Submarines
By 1933 the Navy had benefitted from rapidly improving technology and in its own refinement of submarine operational doctrine. The result was the Fleet Submarine era, a fortuitous convergence of events that would greatly contribute to eventual victory in World War II.
Submarines with the * after the name were lost in combat in WW II.
Page created by:
Ric Hedman & David Johnston
1999 - 2023 - PigBoats.COM©
Mountlake Terrace, WA, Norfolk, VA
webmaster at pigboats dot com