S-10 through S-13: Difference between revisions
Pbcjohnston (talk | contribs) |
Pbcjohnston (talk | contribs) →Design and Construction Notes: Additional info |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color:#00008B">S-10 through S-13 were in the second group of Government design S-boats constructed at the Portsmouth Navy Yard in Kittery, ME. As the Government design was being finalized and the first boats laid down, intelligence reports on German U-boats were received and studied by the Submarine Officer's Conference. They came away deeply impressed with the tactical advantages of the U-boats that had a stern torpedo tube. Accordingly, the design for S-10 to 13 (not yet laid down) was altered to incorporate a single stern 21-inch tube in addition to the four bow tubes. The aft most tiller room of the design was vastly altered and reduced in size, and the tube's breech end let into the design's large motor room. No separate aft torpedo room was provided. Space for two reload weapons was incorporated by carefully rearranging the motor room equipment. They were NOT lengthened. These four boats also incorporated the [[S-3 through S-9|'''S-8 bow plane modification''']], having their bow planes on the outer hull below the waterline. | <div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color:#00008B">S-10 through S-13 were in the second group of Government design S-boats constructed at the Portsmouth Navy Yard in Kittery, ME. As the Government design was being finalized and the first boats laid down, intelligence reports on German U-boats were received and studied by the Submarine Officer's Conference. They came away deeply impressed with the tactical advantages of the U-boats that had a stern torpedo tube. Accordingly, the design for S-10 to 13 (not yet laid down) was altered to incorporate a single stern 21-inch tube in addition to the four bow tubes. The aft most tiller room of the design was vastly altered and reduced in size, and the tube's breech end let into the design's large motor room. No separate aft torpedo room was provided. Space for two reload weapons was incorporated by carefully rearranging the motor room equipment. They were NOT lengthened. These four boats also incorporated the [[S-3 through S-9|'''S-8 bow plane modification''']], having their bow planes on the outer hull below the waterline. | ||
In addition, the somewhat unreliable performance of the NELSECO/MAN/BuEng diesels engines of the previous boats prompted the BuEng engineers to go back to the original MAN company drawings and they produced a copy directly from those plans at the New York Navy Yard in Brooklyn, eliminating the NELSECO middleman. These engines, while still not perfect, were vast improvements and were considered to be quite reliable. | In addition, the somewhat unreliable performance of the NELSECO/MAN/BuEng diesels engines of the previous boats prompted the BuEng engineers to go back to the original MAN company drawings and they produced a copy directly from those plans at the New York Navy Yard in Brooklyn, eliminating the NELSECO middleman. These BuEng/MAN S6V45/42 engines, while still not perfect, were vast improvements and were considered to be quite reliable. | ||
This group of four boats were considered amongst the best of the Government design. All but S-10 were retained and served again during WWII, providing training for new submarine crews and running anti U-boat patrols. | |||
The webmasters uncovered an anecdotal and unverified report that by the mid 1930's S-10 was suffering from serious corrosion issues in the outer hull, particularly aft. S-10 was decommissioned and scrapped in the summer and fall of 1936 while her three sisters were retained. It is likely that S-10 was decommissioned to keep the Submarine Service within the limits of the London Naval Treaty as new fleet boats were being commissioned, and the corrosion issues she was facing likely made the decision to discard her easier. | |||
For more details, please see [https://pigboats.com/images/3/31/A_VISUAL_GUIDE_TO_THE_S-CLASS_SUBMARINES_PART_2_5th_edition.pdf '''the article at this link'''].</span></div> | For more details, please see [https://pigboats.com/images/3/31/A_VISUAL_GUIDE_TO_THE_S-CLASS_SUBMARINES_PART_2_5th_edition.pdf '''the article at this link'''].</span></div> |
Revision as of 16:13, 7 February 2025

Design and Construction Notes
In addition, the somewhat unreliable performance of the NELSECO/MAN/BuEng diesels engines of the previous boats prompted the BuEng engineers to go back to the original MAN company drawings and they produced a copy directly from those plans at the New York Navy Yard in Brooklyn, eliminating the NELSECO middleman. These BuEng/MAN S6V45/42 engines, while still not perfect, were vast improvements and were considered to be quite reliable.
This group of four boats were considered amongst the best of the Government design. All but S-10 were retained and served again during WWII, providing training for new submarine crews and running anti U-boat patrols.
The webmasters uncovered an anecdotal and unverified report that by the mid 1930's S-10 was suffering from serious corrosion issues in the outer hull, particularly aft. S-10 was decommissioned and scrapped in the summer and fall of 1936 while her three sisters were retained. It is likely that S-10 was decommissioned to keep the Submarine Service within the limits of the London Naval Treaty as new fleet boats were being commissioned, and the corrosion issues she was facing likely made the decision to discard her easier.
For more details, please see the article at this link.S-10 (SS-115)

S-11 (SS-116)

S-12 (SS-117)

S-13 (SS-118)

Page created by:
Ric Hedman & David Johnston
1999 - 2023 - PigBoats.COM©
Mountlake Terrace, WA, Norfolk, VA
webmaster at pigboats dot com