Cachalot and Cuttlefish: Difference between revisions
Pbcjohnston (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Pbcjohnston (talk | contribs) (→Cachalot (SS-170): Switched photo to better version) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
=== <big>Cachalot (SS-170)</big> === | === <big>Cachalot (SS-170)</big> === | ||
[[File:Cachalot | [[File:Cachalot starboard side new.jpg|left|500px|Photo in the private collection of Ric Hedman]] | ||
<div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color:#00008B">Cachalot | <div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color:#00008B">Cachalot was the lead boat of the last group of the V-class. This photo shows her underway in approximately 1936-1938, location unknown. She did not retain her original haze gray paint scheme for very long. Starting in 1935 the Navy changed the paint scheme for submarines to an overall flat black. After 1938 the C1 class identifier was replaced with the hull number.</span> | ||
[[170|See more Cachalot photos]] | [[170|See more Cachalot photos]] | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
=== <big>Cuttlefish (SS-171)</big> === | === <big>Cuttlefish (SS-171)</big> === | ||
[[File:Cuttlefish port side.jpg|left| | [[File:Cuttlefish port side.jpg|left|500px|NARA photo #19-N-15260 via Navsource.org]] | ||
<div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color:#00008B">Cuttlefish on post commissioning trials, late summer of 1934. The last of the pathfinding V-class boats, she marked the return to the fold of the Electric Boat Company.</span> | <div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color:#00008B">Cuttlefish on post commissioning trials, late summer of 1934. The last of the pathfinding V-class boats, she marked the return to the fold of the Electric Boat Company.</span> | ||
Latest revision as of 17:06, 5 January 2024
Design and Construction Notes
In the original construction authorization for the V-class dating back to 1916, these two boats were known as V-8 and V-9. However, by the time the construction contracts were signed, their names had been changed to comply with the new naming system. Thus, these boats never officially carried the V-class names. Although bearing little resemblance to the other V-class submarines, their construction was authorized by the same act of Congress that funded the other seven boats, so they are considered part of the V-class by most historians.
EB was eager to get back into the submarine construction business, so they asked for and received permission to make several changes to the basic design as developed by the USN Bureau of Construction & Repair. They were able to provide separate crew's berthing and messing, and they expanded the use of welding in the hull fabrication, although both Cachalot and Cuttlefish were built to a partial riveted/partial welded construction method. Cuttlefish was also the first boat in the fleet to receive an air-conditioning plant, with its use so successful that all of the fleet submarines were subsequently refitted with one, and all future boats were built with a plant as original equipment. The Torpedo Data Computer (TDC), a mechanical computer used to provide a firing solution for torpedoes, was first tested in these boats, proving the concept.
While generally successful, these boats were ultimately too small and had too short a range for the role of operating with the fleet in the vast Pacific. After several non-productive war patrols in the early months of WWII, they were retired back to the States and served well as training boats for the remainder of the war.Cachalot (SS-170)
Cuttlefish (SS-171)
Page created by:
Ric Hedman & David Johnston
1999 - 2023 - PigBoats.COM©
Mountlake Terrace, WA, Norfolk, VA
webmaster at pigboats dot com